Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Was Picking This Offensive?

PWK121409cover
Last week Publisher's Weekly ran this cover promote African-American books. The image incited criticism and chargers of insensitivity. But is this really? What's the problem? It looks like art to me.
Predictably, PW issued an apology and their reasoning for using the photograph.

The image was a photograph taken from a new book from W.W. Norton, Posing Beauty: African American Images from the 1890s to the Present by Deborah Willis, a collection of carefully chosen photographs intended to highlight the physical and cultural beauty of African-American life. The image (Pickin', 1999) by Lauren Kelley is a photograph of a black woman whose hair is full of Afro picks, the ubiquitous metal toothed hair-comb of the 1970s, complete with plastic handle in the form of a black power fist. The afro picks are arrayed in the woman’s hair to create a kind of giant sculptural Afro hair-do and the woman is leaning slightly forward to give the viewer a better look at the quirky artificially created hair-pick crown. The coverline for the image is: Afro Picks! New Books and Trends in African-American Publishing and it refers to the feature story “African-American Books in Today’s Marketplace,” a look at the current marketplace for black books written by Felicia Pride.

I appreciate voices speaking out when travesties are valid. There are many legitimate issues raised, especially pertaining to how people of color are depicted in media. But what's really wrong with this image?
I fear far too many are just overly sensitive and too eager to pounce on mainstream outlets, while allowing African-American publications and media sites to thrive in their ignorance. I'm standing by my taste, I think the picture is beautiful. The critics are just picky.

1 comments:

  1. E. AcquayeFeb 4, 2010 06:30 AM
    I am so glad you posted on this! I recently had a discussion about this cover with a few of my colleagues. I would have to say that I both agree and disagree with you on this one. I do concur that people tend to be a bit over sensitive when it comes to the depiction of people of color in the media, but I also feel it’s necessary at times. For me, this refers more to the advertisements I see where it seems like our stereotypes are being used to sell products. (i.e. a rap video for a Big Mac etc.) When it clearly goes past the “know your audience” argument; but that’s a whole different topic…

    Pertaining to this particular incident, I would have to say I disagree with you. Working in the publishing industry myself, I think the perspective people are taking on this is that we don’t see the relevance of this picture for the industry. Not to mention that this picture, which I agree is a beautiful piece of art, can have a pretty strong political undertone. The picks alone which came from a time where the pumped fist meant a lot more than a good time on the Jersey Shore, can send out a strong message to the skeptic reader. We don’t want a picture that might put a label on some of the other works inside. The book is meant to be a showcase for new trends in African-American publishing. I fear a photo as strong as that one could slap a political label on its contents, whose works may go in a whole different direction. In saying that, I believe that this photo in all its beauty serves as a great cover for the book it was taken from: “Posing Beauty: African American Images from the 1890’s to the Present” because it does highlight the physical and cultural beauty of African-American life. I do not however believe it to be the best image to represent a whole new era of publishing styles for our people today.
    ReplyDelete

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails